Housing Market

Communities and Local Government written question – answered am ar 30 Ebrill 2009.

Danfonwch hysbysiad imi am ddadleuon fel hyn

Photo of Grant Shapps Grant Shapps Shadow Minister (Communities and Local Government) (Housing and Planning), Co-Chair, Conservative Party

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate has been made of the net cost to the public purse of the changes to the measures to support the housing market announced in the Budget 2009 in each of the next three years.

Photo of Iain Wright Iain Wright Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Communities and Local Government)

The measures to support the housing market include a £605 million funding package for house building (including a housing environmental package), £90 million to extend the stamp duty land tax holiday, £235 million to help those facing difficulties with their mortgage payments, and £120 million extra support for the devolved administrations. The costs and receipts (where applicable), over each of the next three years, are reported in tables 1 and 2. The differences between Table 1 and Table 2 represent the net cost to the public purse.

Table 1: Budget 2009 housing market measure, costs (£ million)( 1)
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total
Stalled sites 320 80 0 400
LA house building 30 70 0 100
Housing environmental package 75 30 0 105
Stamp duty land Tax Holiday 90 0 0 90
Additional resources for preventing repossessions and evictions(2) 50 50 0 100
Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) 135 0 0 135
Extra devolved administration funding (Barnett formula) 85 35 0 120
Total 785 265 0 1,050
(1) Figures are rounded to the nearest £5 million

(2) Includes MRS

Receipts back to the Government will accrue from elements of the stalled sites package, specifically from the Equity, Gap and Infrastructure and Homebuy Direct measures:

Table 2: Budget 2009 housing market measure receipts (£ million)
Stalled sites
2009-10 0
2010-11 110
2011-12 10
Total 120

Does this answer the above question?

Yes2 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.