Energy Bill – in a Public Bill Committee am 3:30 pm ar 14 Ionawr 2010.
Briefly, the power for the reconciliation mechanism is permissive rather than an obligation. What will be considered to be a disproportionate number of eligible people? Does the Minister intend to change the mechanism from being a power to an obligation? That would ensure that a company that ends up with a disproportionate number of people who might benefit can be certain that its load will be shared.
I understand the hon. Gentlemans point; it is a bit like the debate that we had this morning about shall and may. There is no doubt that there will be a reconciliation scheme, but its design will take some time, owing to consultations with the energy companies, which have a great interest in the issue, and with other organisations. The provision is permissive, to enable it to happen, but it definitely will happen.
One question. Has the Ministers Department come to any conclusions under the present voluntary system as to whether the companies with the largest number of people in fuel poverty have been more or less generous relative to one another? Some companies will have had more customers on their books who are in fuel poverty. Have they been less helpful in supporting those in fuel poverty than companies that have had fewer such customers and that can, in theory, be more generous? Has the Department compared the numbers who have benefited against the numbers eligible under the present voluntary arrangement?
I am pretty sure that there is a reconciliation scheme under the voluntary arrangement by agreement with the companies that is split according to the customer account numbers. The debate during last weeks evidence was about whether we should continue with customer account numbers or move to kilowatts per hour consumed. The point is that there is going to be a reconciliatory scheme at the request of the energy suppliers themselves, so the hon. Gentlemans concern will not arise.