Part of Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill – in a Public Bill Committee am 4:45 pm ar 27 Tachwedd 2007.
Edward Garnier
Shadow Minister (Justice)
4:45,
27 Tachwedd 2007
I am grateful to the Minister for her explanation of her Department’s policy. May I say that the chuntering was an unnecessary Intervention, and that the further chuntering was my attempt to apologise for that from a sedentary position?
There are a number of illogicalities and inconsistencies in the Government’s approach. It may be that in the rush to make Laws and so forth, No. 10 is not talking to the Ministry of Justice and vice versa. [Interruption.] I interpret what the Minister of State is saying and that is not in the least bit unusual. It is interesting that the Prime Minister has said that he wants a further consultation period and an investigation or inquiry into the way in which the Freedom of Information Act and its provisions work and has asked Paul Dacre, the editor-in-chief of the Daily Mail to chair that investigation.
The Secretary of State for Justice said that the Bill raises concerns that it
“might impede legitimate investigative journalism”.—[Official Report, 25 October 2007; Vol. 465, c. 409.]
However, the Clause will ratchet the penalty up. I am not talking about data thieves or blackmailers, even if part of the Minister’s response concentrated on that. I am not seeking to defend reckless, negligent or deliberately ill-motivated conduct by data processors—I would call it Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs’ story and the Minister will doubtless hear more of it in due course because the Chancellor of the exchequer will tell her. I want to ask her about what is in the journalist’s mind at two different times. If we look at the civil regime, we will see that it is anticipatory because the defence applies if
“the data controller reasonably believes that, having regard in particular to the special importance of the public interest in freedom of expression, publication would”— in future—
“be in the public interest” or, secondly, if he
“reasonably believes that, in all the circumstances, compliance with” data protection principles
“is incompatible with the...purposes” of journalism. We are therefore looking ahead when it comes to the civil liability regime, which allows the journalist to have some form of subjective input to his defence whereas, under the criminal regime, he has to show
“that in the particular circumstances the obtaining, disclosing or procuring was justified”— that measure uses the imperfect tense—
“as being in the public interest”.
A proper construction of the expression
“was justified as being in the public interest” is an object test, which the court, jury or magistrate will assess for themselves on the basis of the evidence before them and the advice they receive on the meaning of the expression “the public interest”.
Having said all that, I am grateful to the Minister for indicating that she would be prepared to read carefully the report of our discussions with her officials and the Department’s lawyers, and also for offering me the opportunity to have further meetings with the Fleet Street Lawyers’ Society. I mentioned Alastair Brett, who is the secretary of that group; he is also legal manager of The Times newspaper group, so I am talking about major media operators, not irresponsible, dodgy, fly-by-night members of the yellow press. Such people have a legitimate and responsible attitude toward both the need to protect people’s privacy and the need to take a proper interest in maintaining, and fighting hard for, the fundamental right of freedom of expression.
I shall take up the Minister’s offer and get back to those who have been in touch with me to see whether they would like to meet the Minister. Perhaps meetings can take place between now and Report, or at least before the Bill leaves this House and goes to the other place. I am reasonably sure that the clause will receive close attention in the other place, whose Members will not be under the same time constraints as us. I suspect that that will be the case because Lord Lester of Herne Hill was very busy during the deliberations on the Human Rights Act 1998 when discussing journalistic endeavour, as was my noble Friend Lord Fowler, who is both an ex-journalist and a newspaper executive. There will be plenty of interest in the clause in the other place, so it would be useful if the Minister would hold those meetings before the Bill goes there. Given those offers, which I accept with alacrity, I withdraw my resistance.
A parliamentary bill is divided into sections called clauses.
Printed in the margin next to each clause is a brief explanatory `side-note' giving details of what the effect of the clause will be.
During the committee stage of a bill, MPs examine these clauses in detail and may introduce new clauses of their own or table amendments to the existing clauses.
When a bill becomes an Act of Parliament, clauses become known as sections.
The chancellor of the exchequer is the government's chief financial minister and as such is responsible for raising government revenue through taxation or borrowing and for controlling overall government spending.
The chancellor's plans for the economy are delivered to the House of Commons every year in the Budget speech.
The chancellor is the most senior figure at the Treasury, even though the prime minister holds an additional title of 'First Lord of the Treasury'. He normally resides at Number 11 Downing Street.
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
In the process of debate, members of parliament need to stand up in order to be recognised and given a turn to speak, and then they formally make a speech in the debate. "From a sedentary position" is Commons code for "heckling".
The House of Lords. When used in the House of Lords, this phrase refers to the House of Commons.
An intervention is when the MP making a speech is interrupted by another MP and asked to 'give way' to allow the other MP to intervene on the speech to ask a question or comment on what has just been said.
Laws are the rules by which a country is governed. Britain has a long history of law making and the laws of this country can be divided into three types:- 1) Statute Laws are the laws that have been made by Parliament. 2) Case Law is law that has been established from cases tried in the courts - the laws arise from test cases. The result of the test case creates a precedent on which future cases are judged. 3) Common Law is a part of English Law, which has not come from Parliament. It consists of rules of law which have developed from customs or judgements made in courts over hundreds of years. For example until 1861 Parliament had never passed a law saying that murder was an offence. From the earliest times courts had judged that murder was a crime so there was no need to make a law.
Ministers make up the Government and almost all are members of the House of Lords or the House of Commons. There are three main types of Minister. Departmental Ministers are in charge of Government Departments. The Government is divided into different Departments which have responsibilities for different areas. For example the Treasury is in charge of Government spending. Departmental Ministers in the Cabinet are generally called 'Secretary of State' but some have special titles such as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Ministers of State and Junior Ministers assist the ministers in charge of the department. They normally have responsibility for a particular area within the department and are sometimes given a title that reflects this - for example Minister of Transport.
A parliamentary bill is divided into sections called clauses.
Printed in the margin next to each clause is a brief explanatory `side-note' giving details of what the effect of the clause will be.
During the committee stage of a bill, MPs examine these clauses in detail and may introduce new clauses of their own or table amendments to the existing clauses.
When a bill becomes an Act of Parliament, clauses become known as sections.
