Lord Gascoigne:

Moved by Lord Gascoigne

38: Schedule 6, page 179, line 26, before first “Schedule” insert (1)Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would be consequential on the amendment in my name that would insert a new sub-paragraph (2) into paragraph 1.

39: Schedule 6, page 179, line 39, at end insert—“(2) But in the case of a deemed single lease— (a) there is not to be a single term date for the deemed single lease (as would otherwise be the case in accordance with section 3(6) of the LRA 1967 or section 7(6) of the LRHUDA 1993);(b) instead, each constituent lease has its own term date (and sub-paragraph (1) applies for the purpose of giving the meaning of “term date” here).”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would provide that, where there is a deemed single lease, each of the constituent leases has its own separate term date (instead of there being a single term date for that deemed single lease).

Amendments 38 and 39 agreed.

Amendment 40 not moved.