School Funds

Oral Answers to Questions — Children, Schools and Families – in the House of Commons am 2:30 pm ar 9 Mawrth 2009.

Danfonwch hysbysiad imi am ddadleuon fel hyn

Photo of Philip Dunne Philip Dunne Opposition Whip (Commons) 2:30, 9 Mawrth 2009

What recent discussions he has had on the use to which schools put their surplus funds.

Photo of Jim Knight Jim Knight Minister of State (Schools and Learners), Department for Children, Schools and Families, Minister of State (Department for Children, Schools and Families) (Schools and Learners)

I reported to the House last month that net surplus balances across schools totalled £1.9 million in the past financial year. My officials have held a number of discussions recently with local authority representatives, head teacher and teacher associations and other interested parties. Local authorities have powers to claw back excessive surpluses, and I expect them to use those powers.

Photo of Philip Dunne Philip Dunne Opposition Whip (Commons)

Did I hear the Minister correctly? Did he say £1.9 million? Did he mean £1.9 billion?

Photo of Philip Dunne Philip Dunne Opposition Whip (Commons)

Thank you.

Does the Minister share my view that with some 8,500 schools—nearly 40 per cent. of the total—holding excessive surplus funds, it is no wonder, considering the present allocation of school funding, particularly to rural areas, which are significantly underfunded compared with the average, that school governors and heads are more or less obliged to hold back surplus funds to ensure that they have money to fund their schools for the full school year?

Photo of Jim Knight Jim Knight Minister of State (Schools and Learners), Department for Children, Schools and Families, Minister of State (Department for Children, Schools and Families) (Schools and Learners)

I have had discussions with the hon. Gentleman about this matter. There is a debate to be had, but the case about the underfunding of rural areas is not helped when in an area such as Shropshire, 44.6 per cent. of schools have excessive surpluses totalling £2.2 million.

Photo of Maria Miller Maria Miller Shadow Minister (Children, Young People and Families)

It is difficult to understand why the Government should choose to criticise school governors for being prudent with school money at a time when we all wish the Government had been a bit more prudent with our money. If the Minister still believes in autonomy for schools, will he assure the House that there are no hidden plans for him to come in and plunder school reserves?

Photo of Jim Knight Jim Knight Minister of State (Schools and Learners), Department for Children, Schools and Families, Minister of State (Department for Children, Schools and Families) (Schools and Learners)

We have always been perfectly clear that a small level of surplus is prudent for schools to carry over, but excessive surpluses of the sort that Mr. Dunne mentioned comprise £1.9 billion that was given to schools to spend on this generation of children, not to save for some fictitious moment in the future. That is not acceptable. We have said that local authorities need to manage that, and if they do not, we will look at it again in 2011-12.