Oral Answers to Questions — Trade and Industry – in the House of Commons am 12:00 am ar 20 Mawrth 1991.
Gavin Strang
, Edinburgh East
12:00,
20 Mawrth 1991
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether, in view of the response of ICI to the Government's rejection of the proposed sale of its fertiliser business to Kemira Oy, the Government will review the priority that they give to maintaining employment in arriving at such decisions.
John Redwood
Minister of State (Department of Trade and Industry)
My right hon. Friend will continue to regard competition as the essential matter when deciding his policy on references to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission. As the hon. Gentleman is aware, in its report on the Kemira case, the MMC went into the issue of employment, among several others. When considering that matter, my right hon. Friend looked at the whole report before coming to his conclusion.
Gavin Strang
, Edinburgh East
Yes, but when hardly a day goes past without a major announcement of an industrial closure somewhere in the country, are the Government really prepared to shut down their productive capacity and destroy the hundreds of jobs that go with it for the sake of their dogma and Opposition to state enterprise? Will the Minister confirm that ICI is going ahead with its plan to close down the plants and that in Edinburgh, for example, 140 direct jobs will be lost, not to mention the indirect jobs? What message has the Minister for the employees? Surely the Government must think again when the only alternative is the dole.
John Redwood
Minister of State (Department of Trade and Industry)
If hon. Members read the report, they will see that the market share of the merged company was predicted to fall to 35 per cent. in a falling market. We are talking about a market with over-capacity and with considerable problems resulting from that. I find it difficult to reconcile that forecast of the market and the market share with the idea that all those jobs and all that plant could have been sustained had the merger gone ahead. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State had to weigh many difficult matters in coming to his conclusion on the judgment of the MMC, but he decided that the MMC was right in its report, and that is where the matter rests.
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
Ministers make up the Government and almost all are members of the House of Lords or the House of Commons. There are three main types of Minister. Departmental Ministers are in charge of Government Departments. The Government is divided into different Departments which have responsibilities for different areas. For example the Treasury is in charge of Government spending. Departmental Ministers in the Cabinet are generally called 'Secretary of State' but some have special titles such as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Ministers of State and Junior Ministers assist the ministers in charge of the department. They normally have responsibility for a particular area within the department and are sometimes given a title that reflects this - for example Minister of Transport.
The Opposition are the political parties in the House of Commons other than the largest or Government party. They are called the Opposition because they sit on the benches opposite the Government in the House of Commons Chamber. The largest of the Opposition parties is known as Her Majesty's Opposition. The role of the Official Opposition is to question and scrutinise the work of Government. The Opposition often votes against the Government. In a sense the Official Opposition is the "Government in waiting".