Points of Order

– in the House of Commons am 3:52 pm ar 23 Ionawr 1991.

Danfonwch hysbysiad imi am ddadleuon fel hyn

Photo of Mr Michael Colvin Mr Michael Colvin , Romsey and Waterside 3:52, 23 Ionawr 1991

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I apologise for rising when you were on your feet. Will you acknowledge that the policy of private notice questions or ministerial statements followed by plenty of time for questions by Back-Bench Members, rather than full-blown debates at regular intervals, might be a better way for the House to respond to events in the Gulf as they unfold?

Photo of Gavin Strang Gavin Strang , Edinburgh East

Further to that point of order, Mr. Speaker. The House has a responsibility to give maximum opportunities to all Members of Parliament to participate in debates about what is happening. If nothing else, we owe that to our service men. We also have a responsibility to do so because one of the fundamental distinctions between this country and Iraq is that we actually support a parliamentary democracy.

I plead with you, Mr. Speaker, that the House must have more days to debate the issue. We must have longer time to debate statements. This afternoon we had 20 minutes to debate the attack on Israel. That is inadequate time. I strongly appeal to you, Mr. Speaker, to give hon. Members a full opportunity in the coming weeks, or even months, to speak their minds on this crucial issue.

Photo of Mr Bernard Weatherill Mr Bernard Weatherill , Croydon North East

It is a continuing situation and the hon. Gentleman has had that opportunity. He has made a speech in a recent debate. There are business questions tomorrow, and he can put his question to the Leader of the House then.

Photo of Mr Tam Dalyell Mr Tam Dalyell , Linlithgow

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. It will be within your recollection that at 10.30 pm yesterday a request was made by several hon. Members for a statement on not only the attack on Tel Aviv and the loss of a Tornado but on what proposals have been made, if any, to do something about the Al-Wafra oilfield which is ablaze. We asked for an answer on who will put out the fires. Are they to be allowed to damage the planet for the foreseeable future? Could you not use your influence to ask the Government to make statements on serious matters which will not wait until after the weekend?

Photo of Mr Bernard Weatherill Mr Bernard Weatherill , Croydon North East

I allowed a private notice question today on a subject submitted to me. The matter now raised by the hon. Gentleman was not submitted.

Photo of Mr Dave Nellist Mr Dave Nellist , Coventry South East

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. Will you confirm for my benefit and that of other people that you granted a private notice question today and that, contrary to what we were led to believe by the Leader of the House last night, the Government did not offer to make a statement? If they had done so, questions would have run for much longer and everyone who wished to speak would have been called. Will you confirm that you were restricted by the rule of the House which states that on private notice questions only six or seven hon. Members from each side should be called?

Photo of Mr Bernard Weatherill Mr Bernard Weatherill , Croydon North East

I was in the Chair last night, but I did not hear the Leader of the House promise that a statement would be made today. He said that he would take the request into consideration. The House should understand that a private notice question is an extension of Question Time. This is a continuing situation.

Photo of Mr Tam Dalyell Mr Tam Dalyell , Linlithgow

Further to that point of order, Mr. Speaker.

Photo of Mr Bernard Weatherill Mr Bernard Weatherill , Croydon North East

Order. I shall not take any more points of order. The hon. Gentleman has overstayed his welcome.