Children's Footwear (Tax)

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance – in the House of Commons am 12:00 am ar 10 Tachwedd 1964.

Danfonwch hysbysiad imi am ddadleuon fel hyn

Photo of Mr James Dempsey Mr James Dempsey , Coatbridge and Airdrie 12:00, 10 Tachwedd 1964

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will remove the Purchase Tax on school pupils' footwear, in view of the apparent anomalies it creates; and if he will make a statement.

Photo of Mr Jack Diamond Mr Jack Diamond , Gloucester

The greater part of the footwear worn by school pupils is already exempt as young children's clothing. I am afraid that this exemption is bound to be accompanied by anomalies however one attempts to define "a young child". There is little doubt that older persons already benefit in terms of tax relief from the existing favourable definition.

Photo of Mr James Dempsey Mr James Dempsey , Coatbridge and Airdrie

Is the Minister aware that fixing an arbitrary size of school footwear and imposing Purchase Tax on sizes in excess leads to anomalies whereby, for example, well-built young school pupils are being taxed on footwear while more petite older girls are fully exempted? Is this not an anomaly to which the Minister should apply his mind to removing at the earliest moment?

Photo of Mr Jack Diamond Mr Jack Diamond , Gloucester

Certainly anomalies do result, as I have indicated. The trouble is that there is no better definition available.