– in the House of Commons am 12:00 am ar 11 Chwefror 1964.
Mr Konni Zilliacus
, Manchester, Gorton
12:00,
11 Chwefror 1964
asked the Prime Minister whether, in view of the Soviet delegate's statement at the Disarmament Commission that the setting up of a multilateral nuclear fleet would be an insuperable obstacle to an agreement on disarmament, he will propose to President Johnson at their meeting that this project should be abandoned.
Mr Selwyn Lloyd
, Wirral
I have been asked to reply.
No, Sir.
Mr Konni Zilliacus
, Manchester, Gorton
In view of the fact that the Prime Minister took the line that, whereas the military merits of the matter were still open to consideration and argument, the real reasons for the multilateral fleet were political, does not the right hon. and learned Gentleman take the view that it is more important to reach a disarmament agreement than to have a multilateral fleet at the cost of wrecking the chance of an agreement on disarmament? Or do the Government put disarmament last and war preparations first?
Mr Selwyn Lloyd
, Wirral
I am not sure that I follow the hon. Member's supplementary question. His Question was based on a suggested statement by the Soviet delegate to the Disarmament Conference that the setting up of a multilateral nuclear fleet would be an insuperable obstacle to an agreement on disarmament. There has been considerable doubt about whether he said anything of the sort. If one is to go by Tass, it quotes Mr. Tsarapkin as having declared to the Press on 24th January:
I have never said that there can be no discussion of the question of preventing the spread of nuclear weapons until the United States gives up its plan for creating a multilateral nuclear force".
The Question is based on a misapprehension.
Mr Philip Noel-Baker
, Derby South
Nevertheless, does the Leader of the House recognise that the multilateral force has been an element of great difficulty in the discussions of the Committee of Eighteen?
Mr Selwyn Lloyd
, Wirral
I come back to the Question on the Order Paper. I think that it has now been clearly stated, if Tass is to be believed, that this suggestion is not an obstacle to the consideration of any plan for preventing the spread of nuclear weapons. Obviously, the factor to which the right hon. Gentleman has referred is a matter to be taken into account.
The order paper is issued daily and lists the business which will be dealt with during that day's sitting of the House of Commons.
It provides MPs with details of what will be happening in the House throughout the day.
It also gives details of when and where the standing committees and select committees of the Commons will be meeting.
Written questions tabled to ministers by MPs on the previous day are listed at the back of the order paper.
The order paper forms one section of the daily vote bundle and is issued by the Vote Office