Oral Answers to Questions — Public Relations Officers

– in the House of Commons am 12:00 am ar 3 Chwefror 1947.

Danfonwch hysbysiad imi am ddadleuon fel hyn

Photo of Mr Alfred Bossom Mr Alfred Bossom , Maidstone 12:00, 3 Chwefror 1947

asked the PrimeMinister whether he will now consider in structing all Departments to dispense with their Public Relations Officers, permitting in their place the staffs of the Press to obtain and publish their own unbiased reports of the actual performances of the several Departments.

Photo of Mr Clement Attlee Mr Clement Attlee , Stepney Limehouse

No, Sir. There is no intention of dispensing with information officers regarding whose functions the hon. Member seems to be misinformed. So far from hindering the Press, their work is essential to the expeditious handling of Press inquiries.

Photo of Mr Alfred Bossom Mr Alfred Bossom , Maidstone

In the face of the ever-lasting complaints about the shortage of manpower, and the exhortations of so many Ministers to everybody to work harder, how can the right hon. Gentleman justify this waste of manpower at the present time?

Photo of Mr Clement Attlee Mr Clement Attlee , Stepney Limehouse

I do not accept the assumption that it is a waste of manpower. On the contrary, I have been assured by journalists themselves that these information officers are extremely helpful.

Mr. De la Bère:

Is it not a fact that the taxpayers' money is being used for this purpose, which is nothing more or less than Government propaganda, which is often wide of the truth, and very harmful to all those who read it?

Photo of Mr Henry Harris Mr Henry Harris , Cambridge University

Does not the work of these officials avoid a waste of the time of administrative officers?

Photo of Mr Harry Morris Mr Harry Morris , Sheffield Central

Will the right hon. Gentleman issue instructions that the growing practice of civil servants holding Press conferences should be discontinued?

Photo of Mr Clement Attlee Mr Clement Attlee , Stepney Limehouse

I should like to have notice of that question.