Oral Answers to Questions — Coal Mining Industry. – in the House of Commons am ar 7 Rhagfyr 1926.
Sir WILLIAM REFIRING:
52.asked the Postmaster-General the number of registered and other postal packages lost in transit containing valuables and money orders during the period of nine months prior to 30th September, 1926; the total amount of claims made by senders in respect thereto and the amount paid in settlement of claims, respectively; and the number of parcel post packages lost during the same period in transit, the estimated value claimed in compensation and amounts paid in settlement of claims, and the number of Post Office servants prosecuted and convicted for thefts or larceny during that period?
As the reply to this question contains a number of figures, I will, with my hon. Friend's permission, circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.
asked the Postmaster-General if his attention has been called to the losses incurred by West End stores by reason of parcels lost in transit in the parcel post service, particularly through the South-Western Post Office, during the past 12 months; what measures he has taken to prevent these losses and theft during the transmission in the postal service; is be aware that in privately-owned parcel delivery companies serious losses do not occur, with the system of checking in operation; and, in view of the circumstances, will he introduce a higher scale of compensation than that now in vogue in the postal services?
The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. Every effort is being made to stop the losses referred to. Registered parcels can be insured up to £400, which sum is,, I think, sufficient; but I am considering whether any improvement can be made in the existing system of checking parcels.
Is there any evidence that the large number of temporary persons employed has anything to do with these losses?
No, I cannot say that there is any evidence of that.