Oral Answers to Questions — Russia. – in the House of Commons am ar 30 Mehefin 1924.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he is in a position to make a statement to the House on the progress of the Conference with the delegates from the Russian Soviet Government?
I have nothing to add to the second part of the reply which I gave to the hon. Member on the 16th June.
Surely the Prime Minister could indicate to the House some idea of the progress that is being made with these negotiations?
Does the right hon. Gentleman still disapprove of secret diplomacy?
I am rather surprised to hear a responsible Member use that argument. As I am sure the right hon. Gentleman knows, when negotiations are in progress the negotiations go on till a point is reached when it is profitable and useful to make a Report.
Are we to understand that the Prime Minister is surprised that any responsible Member of this House still believes in the idea of open diplomacy?
asked the Prime Minister what committees and sub-committees of the Anglo-Soviet Conference have been instituted; what is the subject matter of each of them; and which of them, if any, have completed their work?
asked the Prime Minister the date of the last meeting of each of the committees and sub-committees formed under the Anglo-Soviet Conference, and the dates for which the next meetings, if any, have been arranged, of the committees and sub-committees, respectively?
As the reply is somewhat long, I shall, with the permission of the hon. Members, circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.
The First Committee which has been subdivided into two sub-committees:
asked the Prime Minister whether the draft articles, mentioned in the official communiqué of 27th May of the proceedings of the Anglo-Soviet Conference, containing the British counter-proposals have been communicated to the Anglo-Soviet Conference or to any committee under the Conference; if so, whether they have been agreed to by the Conference: and, if not, what are the reasons for the delay in presenting them?
asked the Prime Minister whether the Soviet delegation adhere to the position that the claims will not be admitted of those who subsequently to 12th March, 1917, had taken an active part against the Soviet Government; whether any definition has been obtained as to what action constitutes taking an active part; by what tribunal will the quest on be decided whether individuals have taken an active part: and what is the attitude of the British Government towards this position taken up by the Soviet Government?
I would refer the hon. Members to the second part of the answer which I gave on the 16th June to the hon. Member for Moseley.
asked the Prime Minister whether full opportunity will be given to the House of Commons for discussing the results of the Anglo-Soviet conference or for considering such results as may have been achieved up to date before the House adjourns for the Summer Recess?
I believe the House would wish for an opportunity for such a discussion before adjourning, and I propose to make a statement.
Are there any results to discuss?
Will a Motion be put down, or will it be discussed on the Consolidated Fund Bill?
The Noble Lord had better wait and see what circumstances arise in the meantime.