Mawrth, 1 Chwefror 2005
Order for Second Reading read. To be read a Second time on Tuesday 8 February.
The Secretary of State was asked—
What assessment his Department has made of access to the rail network for disabled people.
How much money was raised by local authorities in England from vehicle parking charges in (a) 1997 and (b) the latest year for which figures are available.
What assessment he has made of the efficacy of acoustic barriers alongside motorways.
What programmes his Department is sponsoring to provide cats' eyes for roads where there is no lighting or inadequate lighting.
If he will make a statement on the future of the transport improvement fund in the Wigan borough.
What measures he is taking to encourage the use of rail freight transport in (a) Wales and (b) England.
What assessment has been made of the requirement for an additional Thames crossing to the east of Thurrock.
Pursuant to his answer of 21 December 2004, Official Report, column 1642W, on railways, what steps he is taking to secure efficiency gains in relation to (a) investment in the franchise...
What discussions he has had with the Home Secretary regarding the use of mobile phones by people in charge of motor vehicles; and if he will make a statement.
What discussions he has had with Nottingham city council in the past 14 days on transport issues in the city.
What representations he has received on the new railway timetables in the south-east of England; and if he will make a statement.
How much funding the Government have invested in major road developments in the west midlands region since 1997.
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster was asked—
What recent discussions he has had with the Deputy Prime Minister on policy co-ordination.
What recent discussions he has had with Lord Birt about policy co-ordination.
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. Will you hold an inquiry in light of what happened in questions to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster? It is a rather serious matter that all six questions...
I beg to move, That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision for a warning symbol to be prominently displayed on the packaging of pharmaceuticals which act on the brain and central...
Mr. Andrew Dismore accordingly presented a Bill to make provision for a warning symbol to be prominently displayed on the packaging of pharmaceuticals which act on the brain and central nervous...
Considered in Committee.
[Relevant Documents: First Report from the Constitutional Affairs Committee, Session 2003–04, HC 48-I and 48-II, on Judicial appointments and a Supreme Court (court of final appeal), and...
I beg to move amendment No. 350, page 9, line 15, at end insert 'situated in the Palace of Westminster'.
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
'(1) The Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland may lay before the Northern Ireland Assembly written representations on matters within subsection (2) that appear to him to be matters of...
'(1) The Northern Ireland Act 1998 (c. 47) is amended as follows. (2) In Schedule 2 (excepted matters), after paragraph 11 insert— "11A The Supreme Court." (3) In Schedule 3...
I beg to move amendment No. 366, in page 17, line 23, leave out 'An' and insert 'No'.
I beg to move amendment No. 339, page 48, line 27, leave out subsections (1) and (2).
I beg to move amendment No. 3, in clause 105, page 46, leave out from end of line 17 to 'unless' in line 19 and insert 'or, if the Lord Chancellor is not a member of that House, by another...
I beg to move amendment No. 351, in page 47, line 7, leave out 'except after consultation with' and insert 'without the agreement of'. Clause 106 deals with the mechanism of removal from listed...
Amendments made: No. 21, in page 40, line 38, leave out 'Minister' and insert 'Lord Chancellor'. No. 22, in page 40, line 39, leave out 'Minister' and insert 'Lord Chancellor'. No. 23, in page...
Amendment made: No. 15, in page 42, line 14, leave out subsection (7) and insert— '(7) The times when a person becomes and ceases to be subject to prescribed procedures for the purposes...
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 25 (Periodic adjournments), That this House, at its rising on Thursday 10th February, do adjourn till Monday 21st February...
Motion made, and Question proposed, That this House do now adjourn.—[Paul Clark.]
Debates in the House of Commons are an opportunity for MPs from all parties to scrutinise government legislation and raise important local, national or topical issues.
And sometimes to shout at each other.
